But in that analysis, how come you are not punishing Norby for voting, while a Fullerton City Councilmember for 3% at 50 also? The Fullerton Council was the 12th city in Orange County to pass 3% at 50 on January 15, 2002. Nine more cities in Orange County passed it after Fullerton did. In fact, if there was such an outcry from you or others when the Board of Supervisors passed it on December 4, 2001, then why would Norby have voted for it only two months later?

Your standard against Todd Spitzer is nothing more than a personal vendetta and we know it.

The facts are clear: Spitzer did not do anything out of the ordinary with that vote. Every city in Orange County adopted it.

Spitzer is the only candidate with a clear plan to fix the pension crisis and he has made that fix a cornerstone of his campaign.

Go back and check the record while you were at the OC Register and see, prior to 2001 did you or the editorial board ever rail against 3% at 50? You did not. No one did; but you are all good at blame now.

Seems like your lack of attention is what is making you look for scapegoats now.

But in that analysis, how come you are not punishing Norby for voting, while a Fullerton City Councilmember for 3% at 50 also?  The Fullerton Council was the 12th city in Orange County to pass 3% at 50 on January 15, 2002.  Nine more cities in Orange County passed it after Fullerton did.  In fact, if there was such an outcry from you or others when the Board of Supervisors passed it on December 4, 2001, then why would Norby have voted for it only two months later?

Your standard against Todd Spitzer is nothing more than a personal vendetta and we know it.

The facts are clear: Spitzer did not do anything out of the ordinary with that vote.  Every city in Orange County adopted it.

Spitzer is the only candidate with a clear plan to fix the pension crisis and he has made that fix a cornerstone of his campaign.

Go back and check the record while you were at the OC Register and see, prior to 2001 did you or the editorial board ever rail against 3% at 50?  You did not.  No one did; but you are all good at blame now.

Seems like your lack of attention is what is making you look for scapegoats now.

It is OK not to endorse anyone, but upon further review Pauly is on the record as standing against union corruption. Spitzer? He is a union whore.

http://ocpoliticsblog.com/deborah-pauly-is-willing-to-challenge-labor-unlike-sell-out-todd-spitzer/

Seriously look at Deborah Pauly for OC Supervisor, her background and voting record prove she is the true fiscally responsible choice!
Debpauly.com for more info!

They are whores as big as dems, just different special interests paying their tab-go Independent like so many have the last decade.

There are MORE Independents in CA than either dems or repgs. We ARE the biggest political party in this state.

Two current OC supervisors (Bates and Campbell) touted as fiscal conservative republicans served in the State Assembly in 1999 and BOTH voted for SB400 which opened the floodgates for the 3%@50 pensions.

So as much as I dislike Spitzer it’s not fair just to finger him. They are ALL in on it. Every single one of them. Your whole system is crooked.

At least down in Mexico corruption is out in the open for everyone to see. Here in America it’s all done on the QT behind closed doors.

No. Spitzer has been tried and found wanting. He should stay in the private sector and earn a living to pay for the massive pension spiking he imposed on us when he was in office.

— John Seiler

When Villa Park Councilwoman Deborah Pauly entered the race, Assemblyman Devore wrote, “”Deborah Pauly has the courage to fight for taxpayers as a member of the Orange County Board of Supervisors, even in the face of pressure from powerful special interests.”

http://www.debpauly.com