<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Silicon Valley Should Buy Hollywood	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://calwatchdog.com/2012/01/19/25452/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2012/01/19/25452/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2015 06:19:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: EC		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2012/01/19/25452/#comment-14301</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 06:29:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=25452#comment-14301</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Just a correction to your post:

Microsoft is NOT a Silicon Valley company. It&#039;s a Seattle-area company.

(Editor&#039;s note: Thanks. I put a correction in the text. -- John Seiler)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a correction to your post:</p>
<p>Microsoft is NOT a Silicon Valley company. It&#8217;s a Seattle-area company.</p>
<p>(Editor&#8217;s note: Thanks. I put a correction in the text. &#8212; John Seiler)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Hank		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2012/01/19/25452/#comment-14300</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hank]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=25452#comment-14300</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Silicon Valley WILLl buy Hollywood. The only holdup is how to make money and/or charge for content. I doubt people will pay more than say $75.00 per mo for content. That would be for a far greater spread of programming than is currently offered in cable or dish services. that would mean Hollywood would have to improve their product and trim their lifestyle. Everything else is in place now.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Silicon Valley WILLl buy Hollywood. The only holdup is how to make money and/or charge for content. I doubt people will pay more than say $75.00 per mo for content. That would be for a far greater spread of programming than is currently offered in cable or dish services. that would mean Hollywood would have to improve their product and trim their lifestyle. Everything else is in place now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: calwatchdog.com @ 2026-06-09 02:36:11 by W3 Total Cache
-->