Govt. Union Boss in Top 1%

John Seiler:

The Occupy Wall Street crowd is protesting against the high pay of the top 1 percent in income in America. They say they’re part of the “99%ers” — all the working people who keep the country going.

Our friend Larry Sand points out that California’s government worker unions, especially the teachers’ unions, are joining the bandwagon, claiming to represent the 99 percent. He writes:

It’s almost Halloween and the California Teachers Association, a rich and powerful outfit, is in costume as one of the “99%ers” – protesters who claim to be have-nots.

A couple of weeks ago United Federation of Teachers President Michael Mulgrew and American Federation of Teachers President Randi Weingarten made sympathetic statements about the Occupy Wall Street movement. Now the California Teachers Association has jumped in with a full endorsement and suggestions on its website as to how teachers and others can get involved in OWS activities.

Well, guess what?

Larry listed the salaries of some of the government union “99%ers.”

I plugged those salaries into the “What percent are you?” calculator. Here’s what I found:

* National Education Association President Dennis Van Roekel (parent group of the CTA): $543,868 in salary in benefits: He’s actually a “1%er” — in the top 1 percent of incomes in America. So, by joining OWS, he’s protesting against himself!

* American Federation of Teachers President Randi Weingarten (parent of the California Federation of Teachers): $493,859. Turns out she’s not in the top 1 percent — just the top 2 percent. So, she’s part of the proletariate — she’s an authentic 99%er. A real working-class person. Salt of the earth. Has trouble feeding herself.

* CTA President David Sanchez: $289,550. Another poor working stiff! He’s in the top 4 percent. As Sands notes, that’s “three times what an average teacher in CA makes.” Yet he, too, is an authentic, working-class “99%er.”

Actually: Bunch o’ fat cats, living off our tax money.

And let’s remember that this money for their salaries is forcibly taken from teachers’ dues — which originally is funded with money stolen from taxpayers. Unions keep resisting any move to make union dues optional — even dues for political causes that teachers themselves may despise.

It’s the best scam around because it’s all done “for the children.”

Wall Street certainly has a lot of sins to answer for. In particular, it buys the politicians who rip off our tax money for bailouts. President Bush’s treasury secretary was Hank Paulson, former top honcho at Goldman Sachs. When Paulson was doling out Bush’s TARP bailout money, guess who got a huge chunk? Hint: Initials are G.S.

But the government worker unions also are part of the government-Wall Street-union Axis of Bankruptcy.

What we need is an Occupy the Schools movement to get union power out of the classrooms — and competency and standards back in.

– Oct. 25, 2011

 

 

 

Tags: , ,

Comments(7)
  1. Rogue Elephant says:

    Some animals are created more equal than others.

  2. Bob says:

    Now, now, let’s not be too critical. After all, everything these 1 percenters do is “for the children” as our government masters always shriek.

    And if that doesn’t convince you I’m sure Steveo will explain to us why this situation is perfectly wonderful.

  3. Barb says:

    Oh, this is rich! As for the OSM, I’m in!

  4. stevefromsacto says:

    Bob-o, as usual you put your mouth in drive before your brain starts up. The salaries that the education union leaders make come from the dues payments of their members. And one would think in your wonderful conservative world that what the teachers do with their paychecks (such as pay dues) is none of your damn business.

    The situation is not wonderful; it’s horrible. Perhaps if more of the 1 percent gave a damn about “the children” and the others who aren’t well-off and well-connected, we wouldn’t have people occupying Wall Street.

  5. mr g says:

    Oh, come now. While annual remuneration is certainly an issue, the real top 1% are those whose assets, rather than salaries, are large. What are the net worths of Van Roekel, Weingarten, and Sanchez? Almost certainly less than $2 million each. This doesn’t put them anywhere near the top 1%.

    Oh, and BTW, David Sanchez is not the president of CTA. Please check your facts if you want credibility!

  6. CalWatchdog says:

    Mr. G. According to this Web page on the CTA’s Web site, David Sanchez IS the president of the CTA:

    http://www.cta.org/About-CTA/Leadership/Copy-of-board/David-A-Sanchez.aspx

    – John Seiler

  7. [...] After publication of the story, we came across a beautiful piece written by John Seiler on his CalWatchDog.com website.      Using data provided by Los Angeles-based reformer Larry Sand, Seiler ran the [...]

Know Your Bloggers
katy_grimes
Katy Grimes is CalWatchdog’s news reporter. Grimes is a longtime political analyst, writer and journalist. Grimes has ...
john_seiler
John Seiler, an editorial writer with The Orange County Register for 19 years, is the managing editor for CalWatchDog...
steven_greenhut
Steven Greenhut is CalWatchdog’s contributing editor. Greenhut was deputy editor and columnist for The Orange County Regis...
Blog Archive
Archive By Categories
  • California economy
  • Education
  • Fracking
  • Health Care
  • Infrastructure
  • Inside Government
  • Media
  • Obamacare
  • Obamacare implementation
  • Pension Reform
  • Politics and Elections
  • Regulations
  • Rights and Liberties
  • Seen at the Capitol
  • Taxes
  • Waste, Fraud and Abuse
  • Archives by Month
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010