Too Crazy Even for Jerry Brown

Steven Greenhut: Gov. Jerry Brown vetoed union-backed legislation that would promote the unionization of child care providers. If a kid receives public assistance, then the Service Employees International Union would get to organize workers, grab union dues and insert themselves more deeply into the home. This bill, promoted by former union organizer and current Assembly Speaker John Perez, is a reminder that the Democratic leadership is about nothing more than slowly and persistently trying to expand the power of their patrons, the public-employee unions.

Brown has been a mixed bag on union legislation. He vetoed a terrible totalitarian card-check law that would let union organizers intimidate farm workers into joining unions by eliminating the secret ballot. But he also signed legislation that would undermine local democracy by overruling local bans on union-only Project Labor Agreements. On the union child care bill, he was praised by conservatives.

This is from the “pro-family” SaveCalifornia.com: “This is a relief for many childcare providers — mothers, grandmothers, and others — who, for financial concerns or conscience reasons, do not wish to be forced to pay union dues. This money-grabbing proposal would have required childcare providers who care for kids receiving state subsidies to pay out more, thus raising costs for working parents, and ultimately raising the cost of state government.”

Here’s the text of the vetoed legislation. It’s scary stuff and a reminder that unions are always about force. They aren’t about choice or freedom. They want to use government to grant themselves special privileges and to keep out the competition. They are about increasing pay and protecting the worst workers among them. Unions can’t justify themselves in a competitive market. That’s why private sector unionization is fading away. Competition weeds out those companies that are hobbled by union work rules that are designed to protect lazy workers rather than improve efficiencies and appeal to the consumer. The union movement has become a government movement, given that there are no consumers, only subjects.

The governor is an ally of the unions and would no doubt disagree with everything I wrote in the above paragraph. But he is an adult (unlike many legislators) who understands some of the fiscal basics, as his veto message shows: “Today California, like the nation itself, is facing huge budget challenges. Given that reality, I am reluctant to embark on a program of this magnitude and potential cost.”

This veto is good news for the state and a reminder that Jerry Brown, whatever his many flaws, is all that’s standing between California and the abyss.

OCT. 6, 2011

Tags: , , , ,

Comments(0)

Know Your Bloggers
katy_grimes
Katy Grimes is CalWatchdog’s news reporter. Grimes is a longtime political analyst, writer and journalist. Grimes has ...
john_seiler
John Seiler, an editorial writer with The Orange County Register for 19 years, is the managing editor for CalWatchDog...
steven_greenhut
Steven Greenhut is CalWatchdog’s contributing editor. Greenhut was deputy editor and columnist for The Orange County Regis...
Blog Archive
Archive By Categories
  • California economy
  • Education
  • Fracking
  • Health Care
  • Infrastructure
  • Inside Government
  • Media
  • Obamacare
  • Obamacare implementation
  • Pension Reform
  • Politics and Elections
  • Regulations
  • Rights and Liberties
  • Seen at the Capitol
  • Taxes
  • Waste, Fraud and Abuse
  • Archives by Month
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010