<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Redevelopment &#039;Exception&#039; Proves Rule	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://calwatchdog.com/2011/06/03/redevelopment-exception-proves-the-rule/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2011/06/03/redevelopment-exception-proves-the-rule/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2015 06:19:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Karen Renfro		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2011/06/03/redevelopment-exception-proves-the-rule/#comment-5235</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karen Renfro]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 21:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=18498#comment-5235</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Excellent column, as usual!  Just one more reason to abolish Redevelopment in California, permanently, so that it doesn&#039;t come back in another form.  The sooner, the better.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent column, as usual!  Just one more reason to abolish Redevelopment in California, permanently, so that it doesn&#8217;t come back in another form.  The sooner, the better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Donna Barstow		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2011/06/03/redevelopment-exception-proves-the-rule/#comment-5234</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Donna Barstow]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2011 22:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=18498#comment-5234</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Great research and points! Remind me never to move there.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great research and points! Remind me never to move there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: David from Oceanside		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2011/06/03/redevelopment-exception-proves-the-rule/#comment-5233</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David from Oceanside]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2011 04:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=18498#comment-5233</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Very well written. Enjoyed it from the first to last word.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very well written. Enjoyed it from the first to last word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: calwatchdog.com @ 2026-06-09 03:46:37 by W3 Total Cache
-->