<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Initiatives tax state budget	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://calwatchdog.com/2010/04/13/new-initiatives-tax-state-budget/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2010/04/13/new-initiatives-tax-state-budget/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2015 06:04:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Fred Mangels		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2010/04/13/new-initiatives-tax-state-budget/#comment-748</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fred Mangels]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 13:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=3683#comment-748</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ok. Understood. Thanx.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok. Understood. Thanx.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: PRI		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2010/04/13/new-initiatives-tax-state-budget/#comment-747</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PRI]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 01:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=3683#comment-747</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Mr. Mangels:

In this article, I concentrated only on the mandated perpetual spending initiatives, not on the bonds. I wanted to isolate the former category. I might do one on the bonds later.

-- John Seiler]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Mangels:</p>
<p>In this article, I concentrated only on the mandated perpetual spending initiatives, not on the bonds. I wanted to isolate the former category. I might do one on the bonds later.</p>
<p>&#8212; John Seiler</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: EastBayLarry		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2010/04/13/new-initiatives-tax-state-budget/#comment-746</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EastBayLarry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 23:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=3683#comment-746</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It would be nice to see some of the interested parties in these initiatives step up and agree to a temporary suspension, or even a permanent reduction.

About as likely as seeing the Easter Bunny.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be nice to see some of the interested parties in these initiatives step up and agree to a temporary suspension, or even a permanent reduction.</p>
<p>About as likely as seeing the Easter Bunny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Fred Mangels		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2010/04/13/new-initiatives-tax-state-budget/#comment-745</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fred Mangels]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 22:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=3683#comment-745</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Did I miss it? What about the bond passed a few years ago for stem cell research? Isn&#039;t that supposed to be a few billion dollars?

And I realize the money hasn&#039;t been spent yet, but the High Speed Rail Bond initiative needs to be looked at, too. I don&#039;t have the numbers right here but that should be worth much more than the total of the initiatives mentioned in this article.

Thanks for the info, though. I&#039;ve been saying for some time we need to look at which past spending initiatives could be suspended, in not completely repealed.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did I miss it? What about the bond passed a few years ago for stem cell research? Isn&#8217;t that supposed to be a few billion dollars?</p>
<p>And I realize the money hasn&#8217;t been spent yet, but the High Speed Rail Bond initiative needs to be looked at, too. I don&#8217;t have the numbers right here but that should be worth much more than the total of the initiatives mentioned in this article.</p>
<p>Thanks for the info, though. I&#8217;ve been saying for some time we need to look at which past spending initiatives could be suspended, in not completely repealed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bruce Ross		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2010/04/13/new-initiatives-tax-state-budget/#comment-744</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Ross]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 21:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=3683#comment-744</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[John,

Criticize lavish pensions all you like. The deserve it. But Prop. 172 was a source of money for local law enforcement from Day One. The notion of shifting that money from seriously strapped counties to feed the state&#039;s insatiable maw won&#039;t get much traction with the voters, never mind &quot;special interests.&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John,</p>
<p>Criticize lavish pensions all you like. The deserve it. But Prop. 172 was a source of money for local law enforcement from Day One. The notion of shifting that money from seriously strapped counties to feed the state&#8217;s insatiable maw won&#8217;t get much traction with the voters, never mind &#8220;special interests.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: calwatchdog.com @ 2026-06-09 02:29:05 by W3 Total Cache
-->