<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gut AB32 to save jobs?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.calwatchdog.com/2010/01/08/new-gut-ab32-to-save-jobs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.calwatchdog.com/2010/01/08/new-gut-ab32-to-save-jobs/</link>
	<description>Your Eyes on California Government</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:49:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is Real Cal Unemployment At 25%? &#124; Cactus Thorns</title>
		<link>http://www.calwatchdog.com/2010/01/08/new-gut-ab32-to-save-jobs/comment-page-1/#comment-4024</link>
		<dc:creator>Is Real Cal Unemployment At 25%? &#124; Cactus Thorns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Sep 2010 01:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=738#comment-4024</guid>
		<description>[...] It mandates that greenhouse gas emissions be reduced by 25 percent by 2020. Opponents contend that AB32 is a major jobs killer; while proponents say it would give California the lead in creating “green” [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It mandates that greenhouse gas emissions be reduced by 25 percent by 2020. Opponents contend that AB32 is a major jobs killer; while proponents say it would give California the lead in creating “green” [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie Peters</title>
		<link>http://www.calwatchdog.com/2010/01/08/new-gut-ab32-to-save-jobs/comment-page-1/#comment-778</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Peters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 03:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=738#comment-778</guid>
		<description>Money available to clean the air

Charlie Peters, Clean Air Performance Professionals, March 22, 2010

 

The Smog Check issue has been under continuous legislative debate since 1993. AB 2289 by Eng is an opportunity to improve program performance and public support.

 

We at the Clean Air Performance Professionals propose “reasonably available control measures” to improve California Smog Check performance. Consider a Consumer Assistance Program (CAP) quality audit to improve smog check performance.

 

We propose using the CAP cars and funds to provide a random quality audit (or secret shopper) of smog check providers. Audits that result in the car’s not being in compliance should be handled similarly to the former Consumer Repair and Education Workforce program. The Bureau of Automotive Repair program did not fine the licensees nor did it involve coercion. But when the question of “what would you like to do?” was asked, the shop took care of business and usually elected to fix the car.

 

The average smog check failure repair is about $ 150.00 state wide. The motorist pays about the same at the average repair station and the CAP station. The average CAP repair is about $350.00. Many cars are not brought into compliance.

 

To level the smog check failure repair playing field so more cars meet standards after repair, the whole smog check market should be subject to a CAP random audit.

 

Around 1985, BAR started a “missing part” audit. In 1991 that program was stopped, The difference was a 300 percent change in result in finding the missing part.

 

When BAR ran less than one audit per station per year, the result was a change in behavior that started at more than an 80 percent rate, but moved to less than 20 percent rate of noncompliance.

 

The difference was a 300 percent change in result in finding the missing part. If the CAP audit was addressing the issue of repair compliance rather than just finding a missing part, the results may be the same or a 300 percent improvement in compliance.  With the missing part program, a follow-up audit with increasing demands lift the stations no options but to find the missing part or be removed from the game. 

 

There are huge inconsistencies from Smog Check station to station and with BAR representatives. For BAR to decide a car is not in compliance, rules of Smog Check must be clarified.  Money is available for the CAP program. It can be used for contracted scrap and repairs, or some of the funds can be used to evaluate and support improved performance of licensed small business. The cars and funds are the same, but the results may be credit for 2,000 tons per day in pollution prevention credit in the State Implementation Plan, rather than our current credit of fewer than 400 tons per day. 

 

The governor and state Legislature would get the credit for improved performance. Performance improvements would be accomplished at a cost of less than $500.00 per ton. And program illusions would be reduced in 1 year. 



 Charlie Peters is president of Clean Air Performance Professionals. 

 

CAPP contact: Charlie Peters (510) 537-1796  cappcharlie@earthlink.net</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Money available to clean the air</p>
<p>Charlie Peters, Clean Air Performance Professionals, March 22, 2010</p>
<p>The Smog Check issue has been under continuous legislative debate since 1993. AB 2289 by Eng is an opportunity to improve program performance and public support.</p>
<p>We at the Clean Air Performance Professionals propose “reasonably available control measures” to improve California Smog Check performance. Consider a Consumer Assistance Program (CAP) quality audit to improve smog check performance.</p>
<p>We propose using the CAP cars and funds to provide a random quality audit (or secret shopper) of smog check providers. Audits that result in the car’s not being in compliance should be handled similarly to the former Consumer Repair and Education Workforce program. The Bureau of Automotive Repair program did not fine the licensees nor did it involve coercion. But when the question of “what would you like to do?” was asked, the shop took care of business and usually elected to fix the car.</p>
<p>The average smog check failure repair is about $ 150.00 state wide. The motorist pays about the same at the average repair station and the CAP station. The average CAP repair is about $350.00. Many cars are not brought into compliance.</p>
<p>To level the smog check failure repair playing field so more cars meet standards after repair, the whole smog check market should be subject to a CAP random audit.</p>
<p>Around 1985, BAR started a “missing part” audit. In 1991 that program was stopped, The difference was a 300 percent change in result in finding the missing part.</p>
<p>When BAR ran less than one audit per station per year, the result was a change in behavior that started at more than an 80 percent rate, but moved to less than 20 percent rate of noncompliance.</p>
<p>The difference was a 300 percent change in result in finding the missing part. If the CAP audit was addressing the issue of repair compliance rather than just finding a missing part, the results may be the same or a 300 percent improvement in compliance.  With the missing part program, a follow-up audit with increasing demands lift the stations no options but to find the missing part or be removed from the game. </p>
<p>There are huge inconsistencies from Smog Check station to station and with BAR representatives. For BAR to decide a car is not in compliance, rules of Smog Check must be clarified.  Money is available for the CAP program. It can be used for contracted scrap and repairs, or some of the funds can be used to evaluate and support improved performance of licensed small business. The cars and funds are the same, but the results may be credit for 2,000 tons per day in pollution prevention credit in the State Implementation Plan, rather than our current credit of fewer than 400 tons per day. </p>
<p>The governor and state Legislature would get the credit for improved performance. Performance improvements would be accomplished at a cost of less than $500.00 per ton. And program illusions would be reduced in 1 year. </p>
<p> Charlie Peters is president of Clean Air Performance Professionals. </p>
<p>CAPP contact: Charlie Peters (510) 537-1796  <a href="mailto:cappcharlie@earthlink.net">cappcharlie@earthlink.net</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie Peters</title>
		<link>http://www.calwatchdog.com/2010/01/08/new-gut-ab32-to-save-jobs/comment-page-1/#comment-118</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Peters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 17:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=738#comment-118</guid>
		<description>Clean Air Performance Professionals

 

 

Friday, January 29, 2010

Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger
State Capitol Building
Sacramento, CA 95814
Phone: 916-445-2841
Fax: 916-558-3160 ( new number )

C/o Lisa

 

RE: Sierra Research Report SR 2007-04-01

 

Dear Mr. Governor

 

California Air Resources Board (CARB) and The Department of Consumer Affairs/ Bureau of Automotive Repair DCA/BAR have contracted with Sierra Research for a Report of Smog Check performance.

 

Sierra has informed me the report was final in March 2009 and released to CARB. 

 

CARB, BAR, IMRC, and the California Legislature are using the Report for public policy but refusing to release the publicly funded Report. 

 

Mr. Governor, I’m confused, can you refer me to someone who might help?

 

Cc to interested parties 

 

From: Charlie Peters 

Clean Air Performance Professionals

cappcharlie@earthlink.net

 (510) 537-1796 - fax: (510) 537-9675</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clean Air Performance Professionals</p>
<p>Friday, January 29, 2010</p>
<p>Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger<br />
State Capitol Building<br />
Sacramento, CA 95814<br />
Phone: 916-445-2841<br />
Fax: 916-558-3160 ( new number )</p>
<p>C/o Lisa</p>
<p>RE: Sierra Research Report SR 2007-04-01</p>
<p>Dear Mr. Governor</p>
<p>California Air Resources Board (CARB) and The Department of Consumer Affairs/ Bureau of Automotive Repair DCA/BAR have contracted with Sierra Research for a Report of Smog Check performance.</p>
<p>Sierra has informed me the report was final in March 2009 and released to CARB. </p>
<p>CARB, BAR, IMRC, and the California Legislature are using the Report for public policy but refusing to release the publicly funded Report. </p>
<p>Mr. Governor, I’m confused, can you refer me to someone who might help?</p>
<p>Cc to interested parties </p>
<p>From: Charlie Peters </p>
<p>Clean Air Performance Professionals</p>
<p><a href="mailto:cappcharlie@earthlink.net">cappcharlie@earthlink.net</a></p>
<p> (510) 537-1796 &#8211; fax: (510) 537-9675</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gayle Kindall</title>
		<link>http://www.calwatchdog.com/2010/01/08/new-gut-ab32-to-save-jobs/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Gayle Kindall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 22:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=738#comment-23</guid>
		<description>I think it should be repealed--too expensive and not inclusive of all our resources in California</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it should be repealed&#8211;too expensive and not inclusive of all our resources in California</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

